Which is worse: the NSA or the FDA?

http://ift.tt/2awManA

A message to Wikileaks, Cryptome, Public Intelligence, and other sites that expose secrets

Does 2.25 million deaths in America, per decade, at the hands of the medical system, rate as a significant leak?

By Jon Rappoport

As my readers know, I’ve reported on a number of scandals concerning the toxicity of medical drugs, including shocking death numbers in the US.

These scandals are leaks from inside the National Security State.

If you visit Wikileaks, Cryptome, Public Intelligence, and other similar sites, how many purely medical documents do you find posted?

How many damaging leaks exposing the crimes of the medical cartel do you find?

Very, very few.

Where are the medical insiders who are liberating and passing along incriminating documentary evidence?

Some of the best exposers of political, intelligence-agency, and military crimes are way behind the curve, when it comes to medical matters.

The medical sphere, for various reasons, is far better protected than any other segment of society.

For the hundredth time, let me cite Dr. Barbara Starfield’s stunning review, “Is US health really the best in the world?” published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Starfield, at the time, was working as a highly respected public health expert, at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

She concluded that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans a year. That would add up to 2.25 million deaths per decade.

Laid directly at the door of the American medical complex.

106,000 of those annual deaths, as Starfield reports, are the direct result of medical drugs.

Aside from the genocidal death toll, Starfield’s findings also imply massive fraud in all medical journals that routinely publish glowing results of clinical trials of drugs.

Such trials open the door to the marketing of drugs that kill, according to Starfield, 106,000 Americans every year. How is this possible unless deep, continuing, and abetted research fraud are the order of the day?

Indeed, Dr. Marcia Angell, the editor of New England Journal of Medicine for 20 years, wrote the following:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009)

The FDA, of course, is the single government agency responsible for certifying drugs as safe and effective, before their public release is permitted. Yet the FDA takes absolutely no responsibility for the deaths.

Can you imagine the feeding frenzy, if, say, some leaker in the Pentagon passed along a political/military document to Wikileaks that showed the Dept. of Defense was poisoning to death, like clockwork, a hundred thousand of its own soldiers every year?

Let’s stop this insane nonsense of separating one whole set of government crimes from another, simply because the propagandized priests in the white coats are above reproach.

We’re not living in 1950 anymore, and this isn’t Kansas.

In 1988, when I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., I stated that medical covert ops are the most successful methods for pacifying, debilitating, and controlling populations, through toxification, because these ops fly the flag of political neutrality.

They appear to favor no king, dictator, president, government administration or partisan position.

Their propaganda is all about healing and helping.

In fact, the medical cartel is, in the long run, the most effective branch of political repression, from one end of the planet to the other.

It favors top-down control by those in power, whoever they are, whatever they claim to stand for.

Consider this: when Ed Snowden released NSA documents that showed the extent of government surveillance on populations, no one from the intelligence establishment made a serious case that Snowden’s revelations were false. Instead, they attacked Snowden for exposing “methods” of “the war on terror.”

However, in the medical arena, leakers would be afraid that doctors, medical bureaucrats, public health agencies, government leaders, drug-company fronts, and major media outlets would, all at once, deny the validity and truth of the leaks—despite the fact that the truth is there for all to see.

In other words, the best protected cartel in the world—medical—would act in a far more Orwellian fashion. It would say: the truth is not the truth, the facts are not the facts, 2 and 2 do not equal 4—and the cartel would get away with doing that.

This is the kind of clout we’re talking about when it comes to medical matters.

Over the years, I’ve alerted mainstream reporters to the Starfield review, cited above, and other confirming published studies that reveal the horrific extent of medical destruction. Those reporters who bothered to get back to me issued blanket denials. They essentially said, “Yes, I see the evidence and the facts, but the facts aren’t facts. What’s happening isn’t happening.”

Now we’re talking about some heavy brainwashing.

By comparison, it makes the quality of the scandal around Snowden seem like a Sunday lunch in the park.

A few years ago, I had one reporter, who exposes political leaks, tell me: “I don’t mess with medical stuff. It would ruin my credibility.”

Indeed. Another indication of how powerful the medical apparatus is.

Recently, the Washington Post highlighted a new study that puts “medical errors” as the 3rd leading cause of death in America. There hasn’t been any significant follow-up. There hasn’t been an explosion of outrage. So even when exposure occurs, the brainwashing factor is so strong it makes no difference. It’s just another ho-hum day in the news business.

That’s mind control par excellence. That’s tremendous protection of criminals.

That’s like a crime boss saying, “Yeah, I kill 225,000 people every year, but it’s an accident”—and nothing happens.

He goes his merry way, and everyone praises him as a humanitarian.

Talk about inventing and selling false reality.

This one is at the top of the charts, and it stays there.

I could stop here, but I’m going to take this one step further, because, as you can see, I’m talking about mind control. So here is the vital add-on:

From the dawn of history, humans have been particularly vulnerable to statements, from “selfless altruists,” about being saved, being rescued, being given gifts from above. And behind those statements, when there is an organization involved, a top-down organization, the threat level rises considerably.

Leaders have always recognized that if they match their pronouncements and assurances with the population’s unflagging hope of being saved, they, the leaders, win. They win big.

Even in societies where overt human sacrifice was practiced, the cover story involved some kind of healing and rescue. The good gods would see the sacrifices and intervene to produce “better days.” Better life for all.

This is what was sold, and this was what was bought. For many people, the times have not changed. Make them a promise of medical rescue, and they’re in. They’re floating in a hopeful trance.

A hypnotic induction has been performed, and it works.

The controlled subject responds with gratitude.

At that point, you can engage in complete contradictions, rank absurdities, and doublespeak.

The trance will hold.

As my old research collaborator, hypnotherapist Jack True, once told me in an interview, “People want dreams. When they lose faith in their own ability to dream about the life they want, they’ll accept someone else dreaming for them. That’s what hypnosis is. Someone else dreaming for you. You accept a substitute. That’s mind control. That’s believing you can live in someone else’s creation forever…”

If I were the head of an institution of higher learning, I would engrave that quote above the gates, and I would build a four-year course that explores the implications of the quote in every dimension of human existence.

The medical cartel is the best-protected organization on the planet.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Vía Jon Rappoport’s Blog http://ift.tt/2ayFHFL

“Ask Donald Trump Anything”: Reddit Begins AMA Session With Presidential Candidate

While the Democratic Convention is warming up ahead of tonight’s headline speakers, including Tim Kaine, Joe Biden and president Obama, Donald Trump is set to host an “Ask Me Anything” question-and-answer session on a Reddit board run by and for his supporters. The “Ask Me Anything,” or AMA, will be held Wednesday evening, starting at 7:00pm.

As the Trump campaign blasted on Monday:

Reddit: Ask Me Anything With Donald J. Trump

 

Who:
Donald J. Trump

 

What:
Mr. Trump will be participating in an “Ask Me Anything” event during which he will field questions from the Reddit community.

 

When:
Wednesday, July 27th, 2016

 

The official post will go out at approximately 6:30 PM (EST) where users will be able to ask Mr. Trump anything.
Mr. Trump will begin answering questions at 7:00 PM (EST)

To participate, visit http://ift.tt/1GeYNx2

Known for its humor and political incorrectness, /r/The_Donald is among the most popular boards on Reddit, with as many as 13,000 people reading at any given time. Some recent prominent AMA participants have included Madonna, Stephen Hawking and even Barack Obama where they have answered (mostly acceptable) questions on social networking website.

Readers can follow the AMA session at the following link.


via Read More Here..

Obama To Federal Employees: If You Can’t Take The Heat Then Just Stay Home, No Biggie

The Obama administration’s Office of Personnel Management is encouraging federal workers to work from home if they simply can’t bear the excessive heat this summer.  Beth Cobert, Acting Director of the OPM, warned federal employees in a recent blog post, as well as in a memo distributed to all federal HR Directors, of the excessive risks associated with “dangerous heat waves” and the precautions that should be taken to “protect ourselves and our family’s health and well-being.” 

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) have teamed up to remind all of us, including agencies and employees across government about what they can do to protect all Federal workers during potentially dangerous heat waves.

 

…severe heat and humidity – like we’ve seen during this summer season – make it necessary for us all to take precautions to protect ourselves and our family’s health and well-being.

 

It’s also important to remember that for Federal employees, OPM’s workplace flexibility that may be used to reduce health risks during such extreme heat periods. If your supervisor approves, telework-ready employees may telework from home on a day when air quality conditions are poor.

The detailed memo points to roughly 20 online resources that federal employees may reference that provide “advice on the best ways to cope with severe heat.”   

All of this inter-agency collaboration and highlighting of available resources makes us feel a bit negligent in our internal communications to employees regarding the heat wave which was simply to use some common sense.

The Washington Examiner also provided this helpful video:

http://ift.tt/2aaIPXJ


via Read More Here..

Vaccines: “preventing every bad thing”

http://ift.tt/2awKFWO

Vaccines: “preventing every bad thing”

By Jon Rappoport

We begin with this: “Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

In other words, the measles vaccine can create a worse form of measles. This is not the normal form of the illness, from which children routinely recover with the bonus of lifetime immunity. No, this is a severe, atypical, dangerous, synthetic, vaccine-induced disease.

Now read this: “…the window of vulnerability of an infant may be even greater in vaccinated women than in with women with natural measles infection.” (Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 79(5), 2008, pp. 787–792).

Translation: Measles occurring in infants—which is unusual and dangerous—is more likely to occur when the mother has been vaccinated against measles. Why? Because she no longer passes down, to her child, the natural components of immunity to measles.

This stunning finding can apply across the board, for all vaccines and all childhood illnesses.

Vaccinated mothers, who would ordinarily pass down natural immune factors to their babies, often don’t.

The vaccinators are creating a synthetic world of pretended immunity. And they want the global population to live inside that bubble—and suffer the consequences.

Medical experts have spewed a great deal of nonsense promoting how serious childhood diseases are. This is an attempt to refute centuries of evidence showing children recover nicely from these illnesses and thus acquire lifetime immunity.

The “seriousness” of the diseases, when they are serious, results from two factors: vaccinated mothers, and a general weakness of children’s immune systems. And that weakness results from sub-standard nutrition and a lack of nutritious breast-feeding.

Of course, breast feeding isn’t going to be naturally nutritious if the mother has been previously loaded with vaccines. It’s a vicious circle.

And remember this: no amount of vaccines is going to solve tremendously sub-standard childhood nutrition.

Claiming that undernourished children must be vaccinated up to their eyeballs—as “substitute protection” against disease—is an egregious and despicable lie.

The vaccine establishment is fully aware of what I’m discussing here, and it has covered it up.

There is no substitute for natural immunity derived from good nutrition.

Finally, if you revisit the first quote in this article, you’ll see another factor at work. The measles vaccine that paves the way for “severe, atypical” measles in children? The vaccine could be falsely exonerated on the grounds that the symptoms which develop in children don’t add up to measles at all. What these children have doesn’t look like measles—

And therein lies one of the greatest secrets about all vaccines. They appear to wipe out diseases, because, after vaccination, the signs and symptoms ordinarily associated with those diseases often don’t occur.

Instead, the old symptoms are altered or don’t appear at all. Therefore, medical experts can claim that mumps or measles or pertussis or diphtheria have been eliminated from the population—when in fact what is happening is the emergence of vaccine-induced disease with different symptoms.

And those symptoms are given different disease-names.

Polio? Gone. Now we have meningitis. Smallpox? Gone. Now we have “lesions of unknown origin” or Kaposi’s Sarcoma.

Vaccinated children become more ill than they would have, and children die. But it doesn’t matter for the sellers and enforcers of vaccines, because they can say, “Look, vaccines are extraordinarily successful wherever they’re given; they wipe out diseases.”

No they don’t.

They just transfer the pictures of symptoms.

And they cut off the population from natural and powerful immunity, the very same immunity that, along with improved nutrition, better basic sanitation, and a higher standard of living, made many serious diseases into light illnesses.

It’s all a shell game. If the vaccinators confessed, they would say something like this:

“Okay folks, here’s what we do. We give the mother and her baby a shot against Disease A. Disease A is a set of recognizable symptoms. After vaccination, that set of symptoms will occur far less often. Instead, a new set of far more dangerous symptoms will occur. We’ll call those symptoms Disease B. And we’ll say Disease A has been wiped out…”

This shell game is played with human lives sacrificed on the altar of profits, and the creation of more debilitation and death.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Vía Jon Rappoport’s Blog http://ift.tt/2ayDiL3

Why A “Dollar” Should Only Be A Name For A Unit Of Gold

Authored by The Mises Institute's Frank Shostak (annotated by Acting-Man's Pater Tenebrarum),

Once Upon a Time…

Prior to 1933, the name “dollar” was used to refer to a unit of gold that had a weight of 23.22 grains. Since there are 480 grains in one ounce, this means that the name dollar also stood for 0.048 ounce of gold. This in turn, means that one ounce of gold referred to $20.67.

 

US_Gold_Certificate

A 1922 20 dollar gold certificate – this note was actually redeemable for gold on demand, i.e., it was a money substitute. Today irredeemable banknotes are “standard money”.

 

Now, $20.67 is not the price of one ounce of gold in terms of dollars as popular thinking has it, for there is no such entity as a dollar. Dollar is just a name for 0.048 ounce of gold. On this Rothbard wrote:

No one prints dollars on the purely free market because there are, in fact, no dollars; there are only commodities, such as wheat, cars, and gold.

Likewise, the names of other currencies stood for a fixed amount of gold. The habit of regarding these names as a separate entity from gold emerged with the enforcement of the paper standard.

Over time, as paper money assumed a life of its own, it became acceptable to set the price of gold in terms of dollars, francs, pounds, etc. (the absurdity of all this reached new heights with the introduction of the floating currency system). In a free market, currencies do not float against each other. They are exchanged in accordance with a fixed definition.

If the British pound stands for 0.25 of an ounce of gold and the dollar stands for 0.05 ounce of gold, then one British pound will be exchanged for five dollars. This exchange stems from the fact that 0.25 of an ounce is five times larger than 0.05 of an ounce, and this is what the exchange of 5-to-1 means.

In other words, the exchange rate between the two is fixed at their proportionate gold weight, i.e., one British pound = five US dollars.

 

An Absurd System

The absurdity of a floating currency system is no different from the idea of having a fluctuating market price for dollars in terms of cents. How many cents equal one dollar is not something that is subject to fluctuations. It is fixed forever by definition.

The present floating exchange rate system is a by-product of the previously discredited Bretton Woods system of fixed currency rates of exchange, which was in operation between 1944 to 1971.

Within the Bretton Woods system the US$ served as the international reserve currency upon which all other currencies could pyramid their money and credit. The dollar in turn was linked to gold at $35 per ounce. Despite this supposed link to gold, only foreign governments and central banks could redeem their dollars for gold.

A major catalyst behind the collapse of the Bretton Woods system was the loose monetary policy  of the US central bank which pushed the price of gold in the gold market above the official $35 per ounce. The price, which stood at $35/oz in January 1970 jumped to $43/oz by August 1971 — an increase of almost 23 percent.

The growing margin between the market price of gold and the official $35 per ounce created an enormous profit opportunity, which some European central banks decided to exercise by demanding from the US central bank to redeem dollars for gold.

Since Americans didn’t have enough gold to back up all the printed dollars they had to announce effective bankruptcy and cut off any link between dollar and gold as of August 1971. In order to save the bankrupt system policymakers have adopted the prescription of Milton Friedman to allow a freely floating standard.

 

fried

Milton Friedman, Richard Nixon and then Fed chairman Arthur Burns. We’re not sure if they were fully aware what the adoption of a completely unanchored fiat money system implied. Today Friedman is famous for being a supporter of the free market, but he was actually a central planner when it came to monetary policy.

 

No More Limits

While in the framework of the Bretton Woods system the dollar had some link to the gold and all the other currencies were based on the dollar, all that has now gone. In the floating framework there are no more limitations on money printing. According to Murray Rothbard:

One virtue of fixed rates, especially under gold, but even to some extent under paper, is that they keep a check on national inflation by central banks. The virtue of fluctuating rates — that they prevent sudden monetary crises due to arbitrarily valued currencies — is a mixed blessing, because at least those crises provided a much-needed restraint on domestic inflation.

Through policies of coordination central banks maintain synchronized monetary pumping so as to keep the fluctuations in the rate of exchanges as stable as possible.

Obviously in the process such policies set in motion a persistent process of impoverishment through consumption that is not backed up by the production of real wealth.

Furthermore, within this framework if a country tries to take advantage and depreciate its currency by means of a relatively looser monetary stance this runs the risk that other countries will do the same.

 

1-US TMS-2

Printing money with gay abandon… US broad true money supply TMS-1 since 1986 – click to enlarge.

 

2-Euro Area M1

Euro area M1 (currency and overnight deposits) since 1980 (national currencies used prior to euro introduction) – more of the same. The main question seems to be which currency is going to be printed to oblivion first – click to enlarge.

 

Consequently, the emergence of competitive devaluations is a sure way of destroying the market economy and plunging the world into a period of crisis. On this Mises wrote in Human Action:

A general acceptance of the principles of the flexible standard must therefore result in a race between the nations to outbid one another. At the end of this competition is the complete destruction of all nations’ monetary systems.


via Read More Here..

Tale of Two Economies: Industrial vs. Consumer

http://ift.tt/QfPtIX

Is the economy strong or weak? The safe answer is – both. GDP and median income growth have remained weak, but employment and consumer spending are healthy. Manufacturing and construction hiring and wage gains have been anemic…

Vía Financial Sense http://ift.tt/2aaGEU3

In Latest Political “Coup”, Catalan Parliament Votes To Secede From Spain

http://ift.tt/eA8V8J

In the aftermath of last month’s Brexit vote, there was an outpouring of concern in Europe that the British decision would embolden similar separatist movements across the continent. Earlier Wednesday, this is precisely what happened when Catalan nationalists voted to approve a plan to secede from Spain, defying the nation’s Constitutional Court and challenging acting Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, who is currently in political limbo as he struggles to form a government.

Vía BlackListed News http://ift.tt/2aeBSTw

Half The Population Of America And Canada Uses Facebook At Least Once A Day

While we, like everyone else, were stunned by Facebook’s financial results, which showed torrid growth in virtually every metric, from user growth to revenue to earnings to eyeball monetization, one specific number sticks out: according to Mark Zuckerberg, there are now 175 million daily active users in the US and Canada. Considering that there are about 325 million Americans and about 35 million Canadians, this means that every single day half the population of the US and Canada uses Facebook at least once.

 

And just as mindboggling, with 226 million monthly active users in these two countries, it means that nearly two-thirds of every single American and Canadian uses Facebook at least once a month.

 

While we have no reason to doubt the validity of these numbers, we hope economists who still are confused why America’s productivity is going down the drain, will finally figure it out.


via Read More Here..

Common pesticide kills up to 40% of sperm in bees, possibly leading to shrinking population – study

http://ift.tt/2avevsS

Preview One of the most widely used insecticides has the side effect of killing a significant percentage of bee sperm, a new study suggests, potentially offering an explanation for a dramatic decline in the bee population.
Read Full Article at RT.com

Vía RT News http://ift.tt/2a0rfIC

Why I’m Supporting The “Demonic Creature That Emerged From The Depths Of Hell” In This Year’s Election

Submitted by Gavin Speiller via McSweeneys.net,

I believe this year’s election is the most important of our lifetime. The next President of the United States will be making decisions that will chart our nation’s course for the next century. We need a strong, principled leader who is ready to shake up Washington. That’s why I’ll be voting for The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell.

I’m just as surprised as you are. A few months back when the ground in front of the White House split open, flames shot out and from that emerged a giant, winged demon creature vowing to win the presidential election and bring about “an age of darkness and suffering that will cover the land for all of eternity,” I was just as skeptical as everyone else. Who was this guy with zero political experience who thought he could just waltz through a giant chasm of fire and run for president? None of the pundits took him seriously, but here we are just a couple of months later and he’s polling over 45% nationally. The truth is, the more I listen to the demon creature talk, the more his words resonate with me.

Now I imagine you’re making the same face that all liberals make when someone tells you they’re voting for The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell. That dismissive, “Are you for real?” smirk. Yes, I am for real and there are millions of Americans just like me. We like that the guy isn’t a politician! Thanks to his ability to retreat into the Earth’s core and emerge with large amounts of gold he’s able to self-fund his campaign. He’s not beholden to wealthy donors or special interest groups. He speaks his mind! Like when he says, “The Earth will be scorched and the rivers shall run with blood!” That might sound extreme, but after decades of seeing jobs being shipped overseas to places like, China, Mexico and the Philippines there are plenty of Americans who are angry and frustrated. We’re ready to watch the Earth burn if it means he can actually get something done.

Some say The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell comes off as aggressive, rude, and bullying. He especially came under scrutiny during the second debate when, in response to the female moderator pressing him for details on a tax plan, he ate her alive. Hey guess what? That’s politics. Those debates get pretty rough and I like that my candidate stood up for himself and didn’t get pushed around. His opponents are now trying to use that moment to paint him as some sort of misogynist. As if consuming her flesh had more to do with her being a woman than it did the mainstream media’s unfair coverage of his campaign. And yes, I have heard the other things he’s said about women. I’m aware that he commonly refers to them as, “flesh vessels for my evil spawn.” What can I say? The guy isn’t politically correct. No doubt about it, The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell is going to ruffle some feathers.

Look, I’m willing to admit that he doesn’t appear “presidential.” You’re probably wondering how a guy who is on record as saying, “The nations of the world will bow to me as master and I will feast on their hearts” will be able to deal with other world leaders. You got me. He’s not polished. He’s in the middle of a tough election right now but I’ve gotta believe that once in office, The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell will begin to behave in a more presidential manner. However, if he does get a bit riled up every now and then can you blame him? Just look at some of the things that his opponents and the media have been saying lately:

  • “He’s clearly evil. I mean, he says that he’s evil. Those are actually his own words.”
  • “He shouldn’t be allowed to run. He’s not an American. He’s not even a human.”
  • “He’s eaten multiple people on live television.”

When you consider that he’s been fighting against that level of slander, I think it’s understandable if he gets a little hot under the collar and vomits blood onto a reporter once in awhile. Listen: I know a lot of you think I’m stupid. How could anyone possibly want our next president to be The Demonic Creature That Emerged From the Depths of Hell? Well, the wonderful thing about America is that no matter how stupid you think I am, my vote counts just as much as yours.


via Read More Here..

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 714 other followers

%d bloggers like this: